|
LEVEL BUSTS
This is a reprint of AIC 94/2000.
The original can be found
here
AIC 67/1996 (Pink 124) described the results of a safety review,
conducted by the Civil Aviation Authority, on the subject of level
busts recorded in UK airspace during 1994. The information contained
in this AIC is an update based on an analysis of all level busts in UK
airspace reported between 1 January and 31 December 1999.
A
total of 455 level busts (i.e. any unauthorised vertical deviations of
more than 300 feet from ATC assigned levels) were recorded during this
period. The analysis identified the most common causal and
contributory factors associated with each occurrence. These included:
|
Factor (directly
causal or contributory to level bust) |
Number of Occurrences |
|
Flight-deck origin |
|
|
(Figures in brackets
relate to factors involving foreign operators) |
|
|
|
|
|
· Non-compliance
with correctly read back ATC vertical clearances |
363 (190) |
|
· Distraction
/ lack of monitoring |
82 (23) |
|
· Exceeding
published SID levels (mainly in London TMA) |
73 (53) |
|
· Inadequate
planning or knowledge of procedures |
49 (34) |
|
· Altimeter
setting errors (including late or not setting 1013.2 mb when
passing transition altitude) |
42 (20) |
|
· Aircraft
mismanagement (both manual and automatic flight) |
28 (8) |
|
· Incorrect
operation of auto-flight system / FMS |
25 (9) |
|
· Failure
in Crew Resource Management (CRM) |
23 (11) |
|
·
Workload |
20 (1) |
|
·
Mistaking heading for a level |
12 (8) |
|
·
Climb /
descent without clearance |
9 (6) |
|
·
Language difficulties |
7 (7) |
|
|
|
|
ATC origin |
|
|
|
|
|
· Pilot
read-back errors not detected by ATC |
35 |
|
· Issuing
incorrect, inappropriate or unclear clearances |
18 |
|
· Late
re-clearance to a level that aircraft was close to or had already
passed |
12 |
|
· Workload |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
· Technical
problems / equipment malfunctions |
35 |
|
· Weather
(turbulence, windshear, etc.) |
17 |
|
· Callsign
confusion |
13 |
|
· Simultaneous
or blocked transmission |
6 |
|
· TCAS |
3 |
The sum of the figures in the above breakdown of factors exceeds the
total of 455 level busts, as each occurrence could involve more than
one factor. Level busts occurred most commonly during the climb phase
of flight, at between 3000 feet and FL120 and in TMA airspace. The
split between UK and foreign operators was close to 50:50.
The Civil Aviation Authority continues to have concern about these
potentially hazardous occurrences. The majority of the factors
identified in the above table are manifestations of human errors in
operating techniques or in communications areas and can be addressed
by the use of already established good practice in the use of
appropriate and standard RTF phraseology and techniques, together with
adherence to established flight deck drills and ATC procedures.
The purpose of this circular is to draw attention to the following:
-
Aircraft
operators’ attention is drawn to Flight Operations Department
Communication 2/97 which provides information on good practice
regarding flight crew drills.
-
Aircraft operators
and air traffic control providers are urged to continue to highlight
level busts in their ongoing training arrangements and are requested
to bring this circular to the attention of their flight crews, air
traffic controllers and other staff who are involved in the training
and briefing of these groups.
-
Flight crews who
are uncertain of the exact content of an ATC instruction should not
rely on a readback for confirmation purposes, instead they should
query that instruction on the RTF.
-
Air traffic
controllers should actively listen to readbacks of instructions to
ensure that the readback matches the original instruction and that
they do not simply “hear” what was expected when an error is made.
-
Air traffic
service providers should take steps to ensure that sector and other
airspace capacities are set such that there is adequate time
available to flight crews and controllers to allow safe and unrushed
interchanges via RTF.
The awareness campaign instituted by the Level Bust Working Group will
continue for the time being and aircraft operators and ATC providers
are asked to continue providing their valuable support by continuing
to encourage the full reporting of level bust incidents through Air
Safety and MOR schemes. |